🤝 Sell as-is now
1stKRW 0
NPV · Immediate proceeds less sale costs
- Nominal net cash
- KRW 0
- Initial cash required
- KRW 0
- Gap to leader
- KRW 0
Compare selling a vacant house as-is now, demolishing and selling the land later, or renovating, renting, and selling with evidence-backed Korean KRW cash flows.
This tool does not forecast prices or grants. It aligns three user-supported cash-flow paths to one present-value date for review.
The synthetic example is not a real local price, quote, or support amount.
Compare all three strategies on one period and discount rate.
The same period applies to the demolition and renovation paths.
Use a rate consistent with the nominal cash flows entered.
Treat immediate net sale cash as the year-zero baseline.
Use a supported expected transaction amount, not an asking price alone.
Combine brokerage, clearing, registration, and tax confirmed by an adviser.
Pay demolition and annual holding costs, then sell the land at the horizon.
Use a scoped written quote or the adjacent demolition-cost planner.
Include survey, asbestos, design, supervision, safety, filing, closure, and finance.
It applies only after confirmation and is capped at initial cost.
Annual average of tax, grounds, safety, insurance, management, and interest.
No appreciation is forecast; enter your own supported horizon value.
Need a demolition budget first? Open the building demolition cost calculator
Include initial works, deposit, vacancy-adjusted rent, annual owner cost, horizon sale, and deposit refund.
Use a matched scope for structure, roof, services, electrical work, and finishes.
Include design, supervision, filings, relocation, finance, downtime, and contingency.
No nationwide standard grant amount is assumed.
It enters at year zero and is refunded at the horizon; it is not income.
Use rent supported by agents, transactions, or other evidence.
Annual average of tax, insurance, management, repair, brokerage, and interest.
This is an assumption limited to -20% through 30%.
These checks do not change the arithmetic, but they distinguish a review from execution-ready evidence.
Highest NPV under your inputs
Immediate proceeds less sale costs
Net present value
KRW 0
Lead over second place KRW 0
This ranking is arithmetic from your inputs, not execution advice, valuation, tax computation, a permit decision, or support approval.
KRW 0
NPV · Immediate proceeds less sale costs
KRW 0
NPV · Net demolition cost, annual holding, and horizon land sale
KRW 0
NPV · Net works, rent, deposit refund, and horizon home sale
Thresholds required to beat the higher NPV of the as-is and demolition paths.
Break-even monthly rent
KRW 0
Fixed cash flows are already ahead at zero rent.
Break-even vacancy
100.0%
Fixed cash flows remain ahead without rent.
Applied demolition support
KRW 0
Confirmation and initial-cost cap applied
Applied renovation support
KRW 0
Confirmation and initial-cost cap applied
Positive values are inflows and negative values are outflows, simplified to each year-end.
| Year | Discount factor | Sell as-is | Demolition | Renovation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Now | 1 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 1 | 1.04 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 2 | 1.0816 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 3 | 1.1249 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 4 | 1.1699 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 5 | 1.2167 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
Combine 90%, 100%, and 110% renovation cost with vacancy ±10 percentage points and compare with the best other path.
| Initial cost | Vacancy | Renovation NPV | Vs best other path |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 0.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 90% | 10.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 90% | 20.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 100% | 0.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 100% | 10.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 100% | 20.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 110% | 0.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 110% | 10.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| 110% | 20.0% | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
Official-law and programme review date: 2026-09-01. This is not legal, tax, valuation, lending, construction, or investment advice.
An inherited or long-empty home can create a deceptively simple question: demolish it or repair it. A demolition quote, however, does not show later land tax, grounds care, safety work, insurance, finance, or sale costs. A renovation quote does not show vacancy, collection loss, owner-paid repairs, brokerage, the tenant-deposit refund, or the cost of selling at the end of the study period.
Selling now avoids a capital project but may lock in a discount for the existing condition. These paths place cash at different dates, so their undiscounted totals are not directly comparable.
This calculator puts the three paths on one year-zero present-value basis. It compares a sale as-is now, demolition followed by land holding and sale, and renovation followed by rent and sale. It uses only the figures you enter; it does not supply a Korean market rate, predict appreciation, diagnose the building, calculate tax, or approve public support.
The highest result is labelled the highest NPV under your inputs. It is not a command to proceed. The evidence checklist, warning list, annual cash flows, break-even rent, break-even vacancy, and sensitivity grid are equally important outputs.
Use the first run to discover missing evidence. Replace assumptions with a site review, like-for-like written quotes, a local support decision, supported rent and sale comparables, and case-specific tax advice before making an irreversible decision.
| Strategy | Year zero | During holding period | At horizon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sell as-is now | Sale proceeds less transaction costs | No later cash flow in this baseline | Ends at year 0 |
| Demolish, hold land and sell | Demolition plus ancillary cost less confirmed support | Annual land tax, care, safety, insurance, and finance | Land sale proceeds less sale costs |
| Renovate, rent and sell | Net works cost and tenant-deposit receipt | Vacancy-adjusted rent less annual owner cost | Home sale less costs and deposit refund |
The current MVP deliberately uses an immediate as-is sale as the baseline. It does not model holding the unrepaired building for several years. That choice follows the roadmap decision of comparing a current sale with two active projects. If an as-is sale would itself take months, include the expected interim costs in the as-is sale-cost input or prepare a separate scenario outside this tool.
The demolition and renovation paths share one study period from 1 through 30 years. Annual cash flows are simplified as year-end amounts. Construction delay, relocation, bridging interest, and lost rent during works belong in renovation ancillary and downtime cost.
A neat spreadsheet does not improve weak source data. Gather documents that describe one property, one scope, and one decision date. Keep screenshots and verbal estimates separate from signed or written evidence, and record whether each quote includes tax and ancillary work.
A cash flow at the end of year t has present value `cash flow / (1 + d)^t`, where d is the annual discount rate. Year zero is not discounted. Each strategy NPV is the sum of its year-zero through horizon present values. Positive values are inflows and negative values are outflows.
The model follows the common-period and consistent-assumption principle in NIST Handbook 135e2025. That handbook supplies a life-cycle-cost method, not Korean legal, market, or investment advice.
Initial cost equals the main quote plus ancillary cost. Applied support equals zero when confirmation is unchecked. When checked, it equals the smaller of the entered confirmed amount and initial cost. Net initial cost equals initial cost less applied support.
This rule is intentionally conservative because Korean vacant-house programmes can depend on location, budget, selection, documents, public-use conditions, and direct municipal delivery rather than a universal cash payment.
Year-zero cash flow is the negative net demolition initial cost. Each later year includes negative annual land holding cost. The horizon year also adds land sale proceeds and subtracts land sale costs and tax that the user has independently confirmed.
The model does not value development rights, zoning change, subdivision potential, future construction, or an option to rebuild. If those are material, this result is only the cleared-land portion of a larger feasibility study.
Year-zero cash flow equals negative net renovation cost plus the tenant deposit. Annual gross rent equals monthly rent times 12, times one minus vacancy, times the rent-growth factor for that year. Annual owner operating cost is then deducted.
At the horizon, renovated-home sale proceeds are added, sale costs are deducted, and the tenant deposit is refunded. Deposit receipt and refund both appear because the deposit is financing with a repayment obligation rather than rental income.
The comparison target is the higher NPV of selling as-is and demolishing. The break-even monthly rent holds renovation cost, support, deposit, owner cost, rent growth, vacancy, and horizon sale assumptions constant, then solves for the monthly rent that makes renovation NPV equal to that target.
If renovation fixed cash flows already exceed the target before rent, the displayed break-even rent is KRW 0. If vacancy is 100%, rental cash-flow capacity is zero and the rent threshold is unavailable.
Break-even vacancy holds the entered monthly rent constant and solves for vacancy that makes renovation equal to the target. A result below 0% means even full occupancy cannot close the gap. A result above 100% means fixed renovation cash flows exceed the target even without rent. If monthly rent is zero, the vacancy threshold is unavailable.
Compare a calculated threshold with conservative local evidence. A break-even rent above plausible market rent, or a vacancy tolerance far below observed turnover, is a warning that the renovation path depends on an aggressive assumption.
The Load synthetic example button supplies a transparent test case, not a Korean price benchmark. It uses a five-year period and 4% discount rate. The as-is path assumes KRW 80,000,000 proceeds and KRW 2,000,000 sale costs. The demolition path assumes KRW 18,000,000 initial cost, KRW 5,000,000 confirmed support, KRW 1,000,000 annual holding cost, KRW 100,000,000 horizon land proceeds, and KRW 3,000,000 sale costs.
The renovation path assumes KRW 68,000,000 initial cost, KRW 10,000,000 confirmed support, a KRW 10,000,000 tenant deposit, KRW 800,000 monthly rent, 10% vacancy, KRW 3,000,000 annual owner cost, 2% annual rent growth, KRW 160,000,000 horizon sale proceeds, and KRW 5,000,000 sale costs.
| Synthetic strategy | NPV | Nominal net cash | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sell as-is now | KRW 78,000,000 | KRW 78,000,000 | 2 |
| Demolish, hold land and sell | KRW 62,275,107 | KRW 79,000,000 | 3 |
| Renovate, rent and sell | KRW 97,795,221 | KRW 126,962,907 | 1 |
In that synthetic case, break-even monthly rent is KRW 403,811 and break-even vacancy is 54.57%. Those outputs merely validate the formulas and interface. They do not describe any district, property type, contractor, public programme, or future market.
The current-law anchor used here is law ID 013478, MST 266691, effective June 4, 2025. Article 30 generally requires permission to demolish a building. A report route can apply to a whole-building demolition only within statutory conditions, including gross floor area below 500 square metres, height below 12 metres, and no more than three floors above and below ground in total. Location, ordinance, and other exceptions can still change the route, so this calculator makes no permit-versus-report determination.
Article 33 requires a completion report within 30 days from the legally relevant completion point: the demolition supervisor completion report for permission work, or completion of demolition and waste removal for report work. The Building Management Act Enforcement Decree anchor is law ID 013742, MST 284661, effective March 24, 2026.
The Special Act on Vacant Houses and Small-Scale Housing Improvement anchor is law ID 012805, MST 284083, effective July 1, 2026. Article 2 generally defines a vacant house as a dwelling that the mayor or county head confirms has remained unoccupied or unused for at least one year, subject to statutory exclusions. An owner-described vacant property is not automatically a statutory vacant house.
Article 11 allows local action under specified safety, sanitation, scenery, and living-environment conditions. The calculator does not decide whether an order, direct demolition, compensation, registration correction, or any local measure applies. A potentially dangerous structure requires prompt authority and professional review regardless of its NPV ranking.
The Rearrangement of Agricultural and Fishing Villages Act anchor is law ID 000478, MST 276431, current at the review date. Article 65-5 can support an order to demolish, rebuild, or repair a qualifying rural vacant house, generally with a stated action period, and may allow direct action and cost recovery in statutory circumstances.
Article 66 is not a universal demolition grant. It can prioritize rural housing-improvement funding in a specific case, including an owner who complies with an Article 65-5 demolition order and seeks housing improvement for farming. Confirm the current local programme and actual decision rather than converting that legal basis into an assumed KRW amount.
The Asbestos Safety Management Act anchor is law ID 011384, MST 276749, effective October 1, 2025. Article 25 provides a basis for surveys of slate facilities and possible support for some or all eligible removal, processing, or improvement cost. Article 27 concerns disclosure of specified asbestos removal work. The calculator does not identify asbestos, design a survey, decide legal applicability, or validate a contractor.
The Construction Waste Recycling Promotion Act anchor is law ID 009592, MST 276695, effective October 1, 2025. Article 17 can require an applicable discharger to prepare and report a waste-treatment plan covering categories, expected quantities, separate discharge, and recycling. Confirm scope and documentation with the competent authority and qualified waste businesses.
On May 25, 2026, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport announced online access to a vacant-house demolition support programme through the national vacant-house platform. The described model can involve a local government directly carrying out demolition when land is made available for public use, such as parking or a garden, for a specified period. Site condition and documents are reviewed before final eligibility is confirmed.
The announcement does not establish one nationwide fixed KRW grant for every vacant home. The calculator therefore starts support at zero and applies an entered amount only after the confirmation box is checked. If the municipality performs work directly, use only a defensible value of the owner cost actually avoided and do not also deduct the contractor invoice as though the owner paid it.
An as-is sale may have a lower modelled NPV but avoid years of shared funding, maintenance responsibility, approvals, tenant management, and family conflict. Keep those non-cash constraints in a separate decision record. If the NPV gap is smaller than quote and valuation uncertainty, execution simplicity can be more important than a narrow model lead.
Do not check confirmation because an application page exists. Ask the competent city, county, or district whether this property is in scope, whether land must be provided for public use, who contracts and pays the demolition business, which costs are recognized, and when a final decision is issued. Enter only the confirmed owner-cost reduction without double counting.
Read the 110% cost and plus-10-point vacancy sensitivity cell before celebrating the base result. If the advantage disappears, obtain structural investigation, a clearer provisional-sum process, a realistic construction programme, and multiple local rental comparables. Also test a lower horizon sale value manually because the built-in grid varies only cost and vacancy.
Enter KRW 0 until the competent authority confirms this property, the programme route, conditions, recognized scope, amount, and delivery timing. The May 25, 2026 national announcement provides an online route and describes local review; it does not promise one fixed amount for every vacant home.
No. Article 2 of the relevant Special Act uses an authority-confirmed period of at least one year and statutory exclusions. Programme definitions and evidence can add further conditions. Ask the competent local office rather than relying on the everyday label “vacant house.”
No. Article 30 includes size conditions for a report route, but local context and statutory exceptions matter. A demolition plan and other procedures can still apply. Confirm the current route, documents, supervision, asbestos, waste, utilities, completion report, and building-record steps with the authority and qualified professionals.
It is cash received with a refund obligation. The model records it at year zero and deducts the same amount at the horizon. Actual lease timing, deposit protection, an earlier tenant exit, refinancing, and refund funding remain outside this simplified annual model.
Tax can depend on acquisition basis, inheritance and co-ownership, home count, land and building classification, holding period, rental activity, actual expenses, and transaction details. A generic rate can reverse the comparison incorrectly. Add only a case-specific cash estimate confirmed by a qualified adviser to the relevant sale or annual-cost field.
No. Resolve every evidence warning, inspect the annual cash requirement, compare the NPV gap with quote and valuation uncertainty, and review the sensitivity grid. Then consider safety, permissions, co-owner consent, funding, management ability, lease risk, and timing with the relevant professionals and authorities.
The useful output of an early comparison is a document request: a safer site assessment, a complete demolition quote, a complete renovation quote, a written support decision, conservative rent and vacancy evidence, independent exit values, and case-specific tax and finance cash flows.
Update the inputs as those documents arrive. Share the annual cash-flow table and the downside sensitivity case with co-owners and advisers so that the next decision is based on the same scope and date.
Official-law and programme review date: September 1, 2026. This Korea-specific planning calculator is not legal, tax, valuation, lending, construction, safety, or investment advice.
Method reference: NIST Handbook 135e2025.