Equipment specification
Match power type, rated capacity, mast and lift height, attachments, tires, charger, battery configuration, and quantity.
Compare forklift rental and purchase using editable quotes, utilization, included and excess hours, energy, financing, maintenance, downtime, major service, and resale cash flows.
These are not market benchmarks or recommended prices. Replace every value with written, like-for-like quotes and contract terms.
| Cost category | Rental nominal | Rental PV | Purchase nominal | Purchase PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equipment and deposit | $1,500 | $1,500 | $11,000 | $11,000 |
| Delivery, acquisition, and setup | $650 | $650 | $1,850 | $1,850 |
| Base rental fees | $84,305 | $78,183 | $0 | $0 |
| Excess hours | $11,241 | $10,424 | $0 | $0 |
| Financing | $0 | $0 | $16,184 | $15,468 |
| Energy | $67,444 | $62,547 | $56,204 | $52,122 |
| Purchase hourly maintenance | $0 | $0 | $22,481 | $20,849 |
| Rental excluded recurring costs and purchase fixed costs | $1,301 | $1,207 | $3,383 | $3,137 |
| Downtime and backup equipment | $12,490 | $11,583 | $39,030 | $36,196 |
| Battery or major overhaul | $0 | $0 | $4,682 | $4,285 |
| Return, selling, and end costs | $550 | $474 | $800 | $690 |
| Deposit refund and resale credit | -$1,500 | -$1,294 | -$12,500 | -$10,783 |
| Period | Rental nominal | Rental PV | Cumulative rental PV | Purchase nominal | Purchase PV | Cumulative purchase PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 (months 1-12) | $33,972 | $33,431 | $35,582 | $28,668 | $28,210 | $41,060 |
| Year 2 (months 13-24) | $34,644 | $33,107 | $68,689 | $29,136 | $27,833 | $68,894 |
| Year 3 (months 25-36) | $35,340 | $32,785 | $101,474 | $34,286 | $31,747 | $100,642 |
| Year 4 (months 37-48) | $36,048 | $32,468 | $133,942 | $24,696 | $22,240 | $122,882 |
| Year 5 (months 49-60) | $35,818 | $31,333 | $165,274 | $13,488 | $11,933 | $134,815 |
| Scenario | Maintenance per hour | Major service per unit | Rental PV | Purchase PV | PV saving | Lower cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70% | $1.40 | $3,150 | $165,274 | $127,275 | $37,999 | Purchase wins |
| 100% | $2 | $4,500 | $165,274 | $134,815 | $30,459 | Purchase wins |
| 130% | $2.60 | $5,850 | $165,274 | $142,355 | $22,919 | Purchase wins |
| Scenario | Monthly hours per unit | Rental PV | Purchase PV | PV saving | Lower cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 90 | $123,577 | $98,329 | $25,248 | Purchase wins |
| 100% | 180 | $165,274 | $134,815 | $30,459 | Purchase wins |
| 150% | 270 | $243,458 | $171,300 | $72,158 | Purchase wins |
This calculator does not determine registration, inspection, operator licensing or training, work plans, or site safety. For equipment used in Korea, verify the current Construction Machinery Management rules and Occupational Safety and Health Standards rules as of August 4, 2026. Elsewhere, check local requirements.
A forklift decision becomes misleading when a monthly rental fee is placed next to a purchase price without aligning time, capacity, service scope, and terminal value. A rental contract may separate the security deposit, delivery, setup, included operating hours, overtime charges, consumables, damage, return transport, and restoration. A purchase quote may omit financing interest, acquisition charges, inspections, insurance, preventive maintenance, downtime, battery replacement or overhaul, disposal cost, and the remaining loan balance. This calculator turns those items into monthly cash flows so both alternatives cover the same planning horizon.
The calculator reports nominal TCO and discounted present-value TCO separately. It also derives equivalent monthly cost, lifecycle cost per operating hour, financing detail, an operating-cost crossover, break-even rental fee and utilization, and a fixed maintenance sensitivity. No default is presented as a market average. Replace every fictional amount with a written quote, internal maintenance record, energy bill, service-level commitment, and finance schedule that matches the exact equipment under review.
Compare like-for-like equipment first, then compare the full lifecycle cash flows. The lower TCO result is a planning output under the entered assumptions, not a vendor recommendation, legal classification, tax opinion, safety approval, financing offer, or forecast of resale proceeds.
Match power type, rated capacity, mast and lift height, attachments, tires, charger, battery configuration, and quantity.
Match monthly hours per unit, shifts, indoor or outdoor use, surface conditions, operator inclusion, and expected peak demand.
Enter every amount on one consistent tax-inclusive or tax-exclusive basis. Do not assume a VAT recovery that has not been confirmed.
Identify preventive maintenance, wear items, tires, battery, call-outs, replacement equipment, insurance, inspection, and damage exclusions.
A new rental unit versus a used purchase unit is partly an equipment-condition decision. A quote that includes two traction batteries and a charger is not directly comparable with one that includes neither. If specifications cannot be aligned, estimate and document the economic adjustment for each difference before interpreting the ownership result.
| Timing | Rental alternative | Purchase alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Month 0 | Deposit plus delivery and setup | Equity portion plus acquisition, delivery, and setup costs |
| Each month | Escalated base fee, excess hours, excluded service, energy, downtime | Loan payment, maintenance, fixed ownership cost, energy, downtime |
| Scheduled month | Any separately quoted contract charge | Battery replacement, overhaul, or other major service |
| Final month | Return cost less refundable deposit | Selling cost and outstanding principal less resale proceeds |
A fully refundable deposit still has a discounted funding cost because cash is tied up between contract start and refund. Financing also requires care: the model does not count the full purchase price and the borrowed principal as two separate costs. It records the equity outflow at month zero, scheduled payments over time, and any remaining principal at the analysis endpoint.
For an effective annual discount rate r, the monthly rate is (1 + r)^(1/12) − 1. A cash flow in month m is divided by (1 + monthly rate)^m. This follows the lifecycle-cost principle of comparing alternatives at a common point in time. The chosen discount rate remains an editable internal assumption; it is not a statutory rate or an expected investment return.
The standard fixed-payment annuity formula is used for a positive interest rate, and principal is divided evenly by the term at zero interest. If the analysis horizon ends before the loan, the balance after the last in-horizon payment is added to the endpoint cash flow. This prevents a short study period from making financed ownership appear artificially inexpensive.
Rental fees, energy prices, and general recurring costs can use separate annual escalation rates. Each rate is applied in 12-month steps, with the first factor change beginning in month 13 rather than through monthly compounding. Excess rental hours equal the positive difference between actual monthly hours and included hours. Energy and maintenance are applied per operating hour per unit, while annual fixed costs are spread across months.
Expected monthly downtime is multiplied by the chosen marginal loss per hour and combined with any separately entered backup-equipment cost. Use contribution margin lost, avoidable labor or logistics cost, or an actual substitute-equipment quote rather than gross revenue. Do not count the same disruption once as lost margin and again as a full backup cost unless both truly occur.
The sum of cash paid and received at the currency value entered for each month. It is useful for the total budget but does not adjust timing.
All lifecycle cash flows discounted to month zero. Use this as the primary economic comparison when timing differs materially.
The level monthly amount with the same present value over the selected horizon. This supports budget comparison without hiding terminal value.
Present-value TCO divided by total planned operating hours. It is unavailable when planned hours are zero.
The first month in which the ordering of cumulative operating cost changes. Terminal deposit refunds and resale credits are deliberately excluded.
The rental fee or monthly utilization that equalizes the alternatives under the other entered assumptions. A missing value can mean no feasible crossing in the search range.
The operating crossover is not a universal ownership payback date. It intentionally excludes endpoint resale and refundable-deposit cash flows because a reliable month-by-month residual-value curve is rarely available. Final selection should use the complete present-value TCO, liquidity requirements, contract risk, and sensitivity results together.
With the fictional English defaults of 60 months, 180 operating hours per unit per month, and a 3% annual discount rate, rental PV TCO is USD 165,274 and purchase PV TCO is USD 134,815. Purchase is lower by USD 30,459, the operating crossover occurs in month 25, and the break-even monthly rental fee is USD 824 per unit. The monthly loan payment is USD 450 and in-horizon finance interest is USD 1,184. Purchase PV under the 70%, 100%, and 130% maintenance cases is USD 127,275, USD 134,815, and USD 142,355. These fixed figures are regression fixtures for the editable defaults, not market quotations.
The following numbers are fictional and explain the mechanics; they are not Korean or global market benchmarks. Assume one purchased forklift at KRW 50 million, KRW 2 million of initial costs, and a KRW 30 million loan at 6% nominal annual interest over 36 months. Annual maintenance is KRW 2.4 million, annual fixed ownership cost is KRW 1.2 million, monthly use is 120 hours, energy is KRW 3,000 per hour, annual downtime is 24 hours, and endpoint resale is KRW 18 million.
For rental, assume a KRW 5 million fully refundable deposit, KRW 1 million initial cost, KRW 1.55 million monthly base and service cost, 100 included hours, KRW 5,000 per excess hour, the same energy cost, eight downtime hours per year, and KRW 500,000 return cost. Downtime loss is KRW 100,000 per hour and the effective annual discount rate is 5%.
| Measure | Purchase | Rental |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal TCO | KRW 88,455,692 | KRW 126,100,000 |
| Present-value TCO | KRW 84,093,826 | KRW 112,815,403 |
| Purchase PV advantage | KRW 28,721,577 | Reference alternative |
Purchase wins in this illustration because of these specific fee, downtime, financing, and resale assumptions. It is not a general conclusion. Broader rental maintenance and replacement-equipment coverage, a shorter project, lower utilization, a larger purchase overhaul, or weaker resale proceeds can narrow or reverse the difference.
A single forecast should not carry the entire decision. The calculator provides purchase-maintenance cases at 70%, 100%, and 130% of the entered rate. Use those fixed points as a starting frame, then manually test the assumptions that create the largest difference in your operation.
This is a cost model, not an automated legal-classification engine. Confirm the equipment registration, inspection, operator-license, workplace-safety, insurance, acquisition-tax, VAT, depreciation, and contract treatment from the registration record, manufacture date, configuration, actual place of use, written contract, competent authority, insurer, and professional adviser.
If the forklift will be used outside Korea, replace the Korean checklist with the local jurisdiction's equipment registration, operator licensing, inspection, workplace-safety, insurance, tax, and rental-contract requirements.
No. Read the included-service schedule and enter expected costs for excluded tires, forks, batteries, consumables, damage, call-outs, transport, or operator misuse.
Input VAT treatment depends on taxpayer status, business use, evidence, and exclusions. Enter every line consistently and apply only a confirmed tax treatment outside the base comparison.
Payments within the horizon are included and the remaining principal is added at the endpoint, so a short horizon does not hide unpaid debt.
The crossover excludes terminal deposit refunds and resale credits. Full present-value TCO includes them, so the two measures answer different questions.
No. Quantity scales per-unit cash flows, but the calculator never invents a volume discount. Enter a written quantity-specific rental and purchase quote.
Usually not. Use the marginal contribution lost, avoidable labor or logistics expense, or actual replacement-equipment cost. Gross revenue can materially overstate economic loss.
Present-value and lifecycle-cost structure follows the planning principles in NIST Handbook 135e2022, Life-Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program. It is used for method only, not as a source of forklift prices, discount rates, useful life, fuel use, reliability, or resale values.
Korean legal boundaries were checked on August 4, 2026 against the current Construction Machinery Management Act, MST 283763; its Enforcement Decree, MST 284659; its Enforcement Rule, MST 285023; the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Rules, MST 273603; the Motor Vehicle Damage Compensation Guarantee Act Enforcement Decree, MST 284827; the Local Tax Act, MST 282559; the Value-Added Tax Act, MST 276117; and the Corporate Tax Act, MST 280349. These sources define matters to confirm. They do not provide a universal rental price, ownership cost, inspection fee, insurance premium, tax outcome, or compliant contract result.
Place the rental contract, purchase and finance quote, and recent utilization record beside the form. Replace every example, align scope, and save low, base, and high cases. The useful result is not merely the cheapest number; it is the range in which the decision remains defensible when hours, maintenance, downtime, and terminal value move.