Purchase
★ Lowest PV cost- Nominal total cost
- KRW 1,441,426
- Present-value total cost
- KRW 1,353,244
- Equivalent monthly cost
- KRW 24,292
- Initial cash needed
- KRW 400,000
Compare a South Korean dashcam cash-purchase quote with a subscription or rental contract using hardware, fitting, cloud and connectivity, accessory and device replacement, commitment, deposit, termination, residual value, confirmed insurance savings, present value, break-even quotes, and sensitivity.
Enter like-for-like channel, resolution, storage, purchase, and subscription evidence. Every default is an editable synthetic example.
Defaults are synthetic examples for explaining the model, not market averages, recommended replacement cycles, or standard contract terms.
Match the expected vehicle holding period and your own discount and cost-escalation assumptions.
Include the device and fitting plus post-purchase cloud service, accessories, replacement hardware, and refitting.
Use the written monthly fee, commitment, deposit, exclusions, and documented termination settlement.
Present-value total-cost comparison
Under the current inputs,
Purchase has the lower present-value cost.
Present-value difference
KRW 39,459
| Cost category | Purchase nominal | Purchase PV | Subscription nominal | Subscription PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Device, fitting, and initial fees | KRW 400,000 | KRW 400,000 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| Monthly contract, cloud, and connectivity | KRW 480,000 | KRW 445,665 | KRW 1,500,000 | KRW 1,392,703 |
| Accessories, device replacement, and refitting | KRW 506,221 | KRW 453,149 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| Power, inspection, and repair reserve | KRW 105,205 | KRW 97,560 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| Termination, return, deposit, and residual | KRW -50,000 | KRW -43,130 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| Confirmed insurance saving | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
Only the monthly subscription fee changes to 80%, 100%, and 120%.
| Scenario | Monthly fee | Purchase PV | Subscription PV | Lowest PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fee 80% | KRW 20,000 | KRW 1,353,244 | KRW 1,114,162 | Subscription / rental |
| Base 100% | KRW 25,000 | KRW 1,353,244 | KRW 1,392,703 | Purchase |
| Fee 120% | KRW 30,000 | KRW 1,353,244 | KRW 1,671,243 | Purchase |
Only the planned purchase device cycle changes by minus 12 months, base, and plus 12 months.
| Scenario | Replacement cycle | Replacements | Purchase PV | Lowest PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 months shorter | 36 months | 1 | KRW 1,356,544 | Purchase |
| Base 100% | 48 months | 1 | KRW 1,353,244 | Purchase |
| 12 months longer | 60 months | 0 | KRW 1,016,639 | Purchase |
A cash-purchase quote makes the device and fitting cost visible on day one, while a subscription or rental usually leads with a smaller monthly payment.
The real decision can also include a minimum commitment, cloud retention, LTE connectivity, memory-card or auxiliary-battery replacement, post-warranty hardware replacement, refitting, a refundable deposit, cancellation settlement, removal, return, and a purchase residual value.
Comparing only the first invoice or multiplying one fee by a rough number of months can put costs with very different timing on an unequal basis.
This calculator places like-for-like purchase and subscription cash flows on a monthly timeline.
It reports nominal total cost, present-value total cost, equivalent monthly cost, the sustained cumulative crossover, two quote break-even values, and fixed sensitivities.
It is a contract-comparison worksheet, not a product ranking, camera-performance score, insurance quote, or legal decision.
The money model uses KRW and the legal boundary reflects South Korean consumer-contract rules checked on September 1, 2026.
Contract classification, withdrawal, termination, refund, and penalty validity still depend on the actual sales channel, payment structure, installation, use, ownership, and service terms.
A two-channel offline dashcam and a three-channel connected service are not equivalent alternatives.
If the specification differs, the cost difference includes hardware and service scope that the model cannot value objectively.
Define the minimum operating requirement first, then request both quotes on that same boundary.
Choosing a cheap-looking monthly plan after omitting fitting, connectivity, replacement, and exit costs.
The lower present-value alternative over the period you actually expect to keep the vehicle.
Freeze channel and retention requirements, then request written like-for-like quotations on the same day.
Annual operating cost is for non-overlapping power, inspection, and repair reserves.
Set refitting to zero when it is already inside the future replacement-device quote, and set excluded cloud cost to zero when it is already inside the subscription fee.
Avoiding a duplicated cost usually matters more than changing the discount rate by a small amount.
Eligibility and savings can depend on the insurer, device age and functions, registration evidence, vehicle, and policy period.
Both insurance-saving defaults are KRW 0.
Enter only the annual KRW amount confirmed for your own policy, never an advertised maximum percentage.
Escalation E(m) = (1 + annual escalation rate)m / 12
Discount D(m) = (1 + annual discount rate)m / 12
Present value at month m = nominal cash flow at month m / D(m)
The device and first fitting appear at month zero.
Monthly cloud or connectivity and annual operating cost run through the analysis horizon.
Accessory and device events occur only at interval multiples strictly before the end month, with refitting included in the device event.
The effective residual value is deducted at the analysis end.
Initial non-refundable cost and deposit appear at month zero.
The base fee runs for actual payment months, while excluded service and operating cost run through the analysis horizon.
Documented cancellation and return costs, less the expected deposit refund, appear at the payment end.
Fixed contract fees and confirmed insurance savings are not escalated.
Future accessory, replacement-device, refitting, and annual operating costs receive the entered escalation factor.
If subscription payments continue beyond expected use, the comparison horizon extends to the final payment so the tail obligation is not erased.
Nominal TCO is the sum of every un-discounted monthly cash flow.
PV TCO is the sum after dividing each month by its discount factor.
Equivalent monthly cost converts PV TCO across the full comparison cash-flow horizon using the effective monthly rate.
The break-even subscription fee solves for the monthly fee that makes subscription PV equal purchase PV over actual payment months.
The break-even purchase device price solves for the initial hardware price while holding future replacement hardware separate.
A negative or undefined threshold is shown as unavailable rather than forced to zero.
The tool first identifies the lower final PV alternative.
It then finds the earliest month when that alternative's cumulative PV is no higher and never becomes higher again through the final cash-flow month.
A temporary crossover before a large replacement or exit charge is therefore not reported as the durable result.
The default is an auditable teaching example, not a South Korean price survey.
It uses 60 months, a 3% annual discount rate, and 2% annual escalation.
Purchase starts with a KRW 350,000 device and KRW 50,000 fitting, adds KRW 8,000 monthly service, schedules a KRW 60,000 accessory event at months 24 and 48, and schedules a KRW 300,000 replacement device plus KRW 50,000 refitting at month 48.
Subscription is KRW 25,000 per month for 60 months, with all other subscription costs and insurance savings set to zero.
| Result | Purchase | Subscription | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal TCO | KRW 1,441,426 | KRW 1,500,000 | Cash sums before discounting |
| Present-value TCO | KRW 1,353,244 | KRW 1,392,703 | Purchase is lower by KRW 39,459 |
| Equivalent monthly cost | KRW 24,292 | KRW 25,000 | PV converted across 60 months |
| Initial cash | KRW 400,000 | KRW 0 | Purchase has the larger liquidity burden |
The break-even monthly subscription fee is KRW 24,292.
The break-even initial purchase device price is KRW 389,459.
Purchase receives a large month-48 replacement event and becomes durably lower only at month 60 after its KRW 50,000 residual value, so the reported sustained crossover is month 60.
A KRW 39,459 final difference is small enough that initial cash, flexibility, evidence quality, and service scope may decide the practical choice.
At a monthly fee of KRW 20,000, subscription PV is KRW 1,114,162 and subscription wins the synthetic example.
At the KRW 25,000 base fee, purchase is slightly lower.
At KRW 30,000, subscription PV rises to KRW 1,671,243 and the purchase advantage expands.
Verify whether an introductory discount applies for every payment month or only for a promotional window.
A 36-month purchase device cycle produces purchase PV of KRW 1,356,544, the 48-month base produces KRW 1,353,244, and a 60-month cycle produces KRW 1,016,639 because no new device is purchased strictly before the end month.
This does not recommend a 60-month service life.
It exposes how strongly the result depends on a user-supplied failure, ageing, or vehicle-change scenario.
App reliability, support quality, cloud continuity, night image quality, evidence value, and upgrade convenience can matter.
The calculator does not assign arbitrary KRW values to those qualities.
Use the result beside a written feature and contract checklist, particularly when PV values are close.
Align dealer-supplied hardware, an independent fitter, and a connected plan on channels, warranty, wiring, auxiliary battery, cloud retention, and insurance evidence before installation.
Check the old device age, memory condition, ownership, linked cloud account, and transferability before entering removal or refitting cost.
Set the analysis horizon to the actual holding plan, but preserve payment months and documented cancellation cost when the commitment extends beyond use.
Combine memory and auxiliary-battery outlays only when they occur on a defensible shared schedule; otherwise save separate conservative scenarios.
Enter the same confirmed amount for both alternatives when both qualify, or credit only the alternative the insurer has actually accepted.
The National Law Information Open API was checked directly on September 1, 2026.
The current records were Door-to-Door Sales Act law ID 000354 and MST 268293, Installment Transactions Act law ID 000355 and MST 260029, and Electronic Commerce Consumer Protection Act law ID 009318 and MST 282793.
These rules are preserved as review boundaries and do not generate an automatic legal cancellation or refund result.
| Source and effective date | What was verified | What the calculator does not decide |
|---|---|---|
| Door-to-Door Sales Act, effective January 21, 2025 | Article 2(10) continuing-transaction definition; Articles 30-32 contract information, termination, loss, penalty, and refund framework | Whether every dashcam plan is a continuing transaction or what penalty is lawful |
| Installment Transactions Act, effective August 7, 2024 | Articles 2, 5, and 6 on qualifying installment structure, cash and installment prices, payment timing, annual rate, and written terms | Whether a product called rental is legally an installment or its actual annual rate |
| Electronic Commerce Consumer Protection Act, effective July 21, 2026 | Articles 17 and 18 on the general seven-day withdrawal window, exceptions for use or service start, return, refund, and cost effects | Whether installation, use, value reduction, service activation, or another fact allows withdrawal in one contract |
A sales channel, payment pattern, ownership transfer, combined goods and services, consumer status, installation, and prior use can change the legal analysis.
Enter only a settlement documented by the contract or provider.
If the amount or legal basis is disputed, consult the provider, the Korea Consumer Agency's 1372 counseling channel, or a qualified professional instead of treating this cost result as legal advice.
No. Actual payment months, initial fees, deposit timing, excluded connectivity, accessories, and end settlement must all be included in subscription PV.
It cancels in nominal cash total, but paying now and receiving it later creates a positive present-value funding cost when the discount rate is above zero.
Use one combined event cost and interval only when that schedule is defensible. If their cycles differ materially, compare separate conservative scenarios.
No. It is synthetic. Replace it with evidence from the warranty, actual failure history, operating environment, and vehicle-change plan.
No. It neither classifies the agreement nor decides legal validity. Enter only a documented contract or provider settlement.
No. Use only an annual KRW amount confirmed for your own vehicle, device, and policy period, and do not duplicate it across alternatives without eligibility.
Define the required minimum specification and obtain like-for-like written quotes. Do not invent a cash value for a feature difference merely to force a comparison.
Review initial liquidity, vehicle-change risk, cancellation flexibility, warranty support, app and cloud continuity, video access, and privacy terms separately.
Last verified September 1, 2026.
Recheck the legal boundary when the statutes or product structures change, and recheck the methodology source when NIST Handbook 135 is revised.
Put the cash quote and subscription contract beside the calculator and replace every synthetic default with written evidence.
Save the break-even and sensitivity results, then ask each provider to fill any missing fitting, connectivity, accessory, commitment, deposit, and exit terms before signing.