1. Enterprise value
A headline for the operating business is often discussed on a cash-free, debt-free basis.
The agreement definition controls, and this calculator does not value the business or infer included liabilities.
Bridge enterprise or equity value to seller consideration, holdback, earnout, advisory minimum and cap, retainer credit, indirect tax, costs, and expected or present-value net proceeds.
Enterprise value is bridged through cash and debt; equity value is treated as already reflecting those items.
Match the advisory agreement, including its cash-free/debt-free, earnout, and rollover definitions.
These are fictional mechanics, not market fees or fair terms. Replace them with the LOI, SPA, funds-flow statement, advisory agreement, net-debt and working-capital schedule, and tax memo.
Align headline value, cash, debt, and working-capital adjustments to one deal definition, then apply the ownership sold by this seller group.
Value confirmed in the LOI, SPA, or term sheet; not valued by this calculator
Verified amount added when bridging enterprise to equity value
Align debt, leases, and priority claims with the transaction definition
Positive favors the seller; negative reduces consideration
Share of adjusted equity consideration allocated to this seller group
Separate fixed consideration held after closing from additional contingent earnout, then enter probability and timing.
Part of fixed consideration but paid after closing
User expectation after indemnity and price-adjustment risk
Zero to 240 months from closing to expected payment
Maximum contingent payment beyond fixed consideration
User expectation for the full performance condition
Zero to 240 months from closing to expected payment
User assumption applied only to timing of deferred proceeds
Apply the minimum and cap to the percentage fee, model retainer credit, and separate invoice cash from nonrecoverable indirect-tax cost.
Contractual fixed fee regardless of closing
Actual rate applied to the selected contract base
Applied when the percentage fee is lower
Zero means no cap; a positive cap must be at least the minimum
Additional data-room, negotiation, or closing support on the same tax basis
Korean example defaults to 10%; verify jurisdiction and taxability
Use a tax-reviewed recoverable share; no eligibility is determined here
No transaction tax is calculated. Enter non-duplicated legal, accounting, other costs, and a reserve from seller-specific tax review.
Verified seller-group cost on one consistent tax basis
Non-duplicated insurance, translation, notarization, transfer, or settlement cost
Enter the reserve determined from transaction- and seller-specific tax review
Seller fixed consideration
$7,040,000
Adjusted equity value × ownership sold
Contract success fee
$140,800
Percentage fee after minimum and cap
Expected nominal net proceeds
$6,309,200
Probability-weighted proceeds − total economic costs
Expected present-value net proceeds
$6,170,270
Expected holdback and earnout discounted to closing
Move only the contract rate by ±0.5 percentage points, then reapply the minimum, cap, retainer credit, and indirect tax. A binding minimum or cap can keep the payable fee unchanged.
| Scenario | Contract rate | Percentage fee | Contract success fee | Advisory economic cost | Expected nominal net | Expected PV net | Advisory burden |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Success fee -0.5 pp | 1.5% | $105,600 | $105,600 | $115,600 | $6,344,400 | $6,205,470 | 1.5291% |
| Current contract rate | 2% | $140,800 | $140,800 | $150,800 | $6,309,200 | $6,170,270 | 1.9947% |
| Success fee +0.5 pp | 2.5% | $176,000 | $176,000 | $186,000 | $6,274,000 | $6,135,070 | 2.4603% |
Set only deferred and contingent recovery to zero, the entered expectations, and full recovery while holding costs and the contract success fee constant.
| Scenario | Holdback receipt | Earnout achievement | Expected nominal gross | Expected PV gross | Expected nominal net | Expected PV net | Expected net rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zero recovery | 0% | 0% | $6,240,000 | $6,240,000 | $4,989,200 | $4,989,200 | 79.9551% |
| Entered expectations | 90% | 60% | $7,560,000 | $7,421,070 | $6,309,200 | $6,170,270 | 83.455% |
| Full recovery | 100% | 100% | $8,040,000 | $7,838,080 | $6,789,200 | $6,587,280 | 84.4428% |
The Korean National Law Information OPEN API confirmed current VAT Act ID 001571, MST 276117, Article 30's 10% rate, Article 38 deductible input-tax boundary, and Article 39 exclusions on 2026-08-09. Ten percent is only the Korean example default; this tool does not determine advisory-service taxability, invoice validity, or recovery. IVS 101, 102, 104, 106 and 200, IFRS 3 support material, NIST Handbook 135, and GAO-20-195G provide boundaries for valuation scope, contingent consideration, present value, and cost documentation only. This is not a valuation, fairness opinion, tax computation, IFRS accounting conclusion, contract review, closing guarantee, or investment recommendation.
A press release, indication of interest, or letter of intent may display one large transaction value, but that figure is rarely the amount retained by the seller group.
If the headline is enterprise value, cash and agreed non-operating assets may be added while debt and debt-like items are deducted, followed by the working-capital or other purchase-price adjustment.
Only after applying the ownership actually sold does the model reach fixed consideration attributable to the seller group being analyzed.
The funds-flow bridge continues beyond that point.
Fixed consideration held in escrow, a contingent earnout, advisory retainer and success fee, legal and accounting costs, indirect tax, and a separately reviewed transaction-tax reserve can materially change the amount and timing of value retained.
This calculator keeps those pieces in one currency and one seller boundary, then shows expected nominal and present-value net proceeds without claiming that any deferred amount will be collected.
A headline for the operating business is often discussed on a cash-free, debt-free basis.
The agreement definition controls, and this calculator does not value the business or infer included liabilities.
Add agreed cash and non-operating assets, deduct debt and debt-like claims, and apply the working-capital or price adjustment.
If the headline input is already equity value, cash and debt are not applied again.
Multiply planning equity value by the ownership sold by the seller group in scope.
The earnout remains additional contingent consideration rather than part of this fixed amount.
Enterprise-value input: equity value = headline EV + cash − debt + working-capital adjustment.
Equity-value input: equity value = headline equity value + working-capital adjustment.
Seller fixed consideration: planning equity value × ownership sold.
Reliable proceeds planning begins by reconciling definitions, not by adding more decimal places.
A headline in the LOI, the adjustment mechanics in the SPA, the closing funds-flow, and the advisory agreement can each use a different boundary unless they are explicitly aligned.
Multiplying a headline value by one percentage is not enough when the engagement includes a minimum, cap, retainer, or a different definition of transaction consideration.
The calculator follows a fixed sequence so that each clause remains visible.
Choose headline enterprise value, adjusted total equity value, seller fixed consideration, or seller potential consideration including the maximum earnout, according to the actual agreement.
Multiply the selected contract base by the entered success-fee rate. The rate is a user-entered contract term, not a market benchmark.
Raise the percentage fee to the minimum when necessary, then limit it to a positive cap. A zero cap input means there is no cap.
If the retainer is creditable, subtract it from the contract success fee and floor the closing success balance at zero. No retainer refund is assumed.
Add the retainer, success balance, and other advisory fee on a consistent tax basis, then apply the user-entered indirect-tax rate.
Percentage success fee = contract fee base × success-fee rate.
Contract success fee = min(max(percentage fee, minimum), positive cap).
Credited success balance = max(0, contract success fee − retainer).
Advisory fee before indirect tax = retainer + success balance + other advisory fee.
For a Korean example, the National Law Information OPEN API confirmed current VAT Act ID 001571, MST 276117, effective January 2, 2026.
Article 30 states a 10% VAT rate, which is why the Korean calculator starts with 10% as an editable example.
That statutory rate alone does not determine whether a particular advisory service is taxable or whether a seller can recover the input tax.
Add the full invoice indirect tax to the advisory fee before tax.
This is the cash needed when the invoice is paid, before any later recovery.
Add only the nonrecoverable portion of indirect tax to the fee before tax.
The model excludes from economic cost only the recovery percentage entered after tax review.
Korean VAT Act Article 38 provides the basic boundary for input tax on goods or services received for a business, while Article 39 identifies exclusions involving invoice requirements, direct business connection, exempt activities, and other cases.
The calculator cannot identify the recipient, business use, exempt or taxable mix, allocation method, or invoice validity, so the VAT recovery percentage remains a user input.
The English example defaults to 0% indirect tax because it is global; enter the applicable jurisdiction-specific rate and recovery only after review.
A holdback is part of fixed consideration but remains unavailable after closing, often subject to indemnity or final price adjustments.
An earnout is additional contingent consideration linked to revenue, EBITDA, regulatory, customer-retention, or another performance condition.
Treating every maximum as certain can overstate value, while assigning zero to every contingent payment can hide negotiating value.
Support the input with operating history, control after closing, KPI definitions, accounting-policy rights, setoff and indemnity clauses, information access, and dispute procedures.
If an earnout has several independent or sequential milestones, estimate each expected payment separately and combine them conservatively before using this simplified field.
The fictional English example starts with USD 10,000,000 of enterprise value, adds USD 1,000,000 of cash, deducts USD 2,000,000 of debt, and applies a negative USD 200,000 working-capital adjustment.
The seller group disposes of 80%, USD 800,000 is held for 12 months with a 90% receipt probability, and a maximum USD 1,000,000 earnout is expected after 24 months with a 60% probability.
The annual discount rate is 8%.
| Line | Formula or interpretation | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted equity value | 10.0m + 1.0m − 2.0m − 0.2m | USD 8,800,000 |
| Seller fixed consideration | USD 8.8m × 80% | USD 7,040,000 |
| Fixed proceeds at closing | USD 7.04m − USD 0.8m holdback | USD 6,240,000 |
| Expected nominal gross proceeds | USD 6.24m + 0.8m×90% + 1.0m×60% | USD 7,560,000 |
| Expected PV gross proceeds | Holdback at month 12 and earnout at month 24 | USD 7,421,070 |
| Contract success fee | USD 7.04m × 2%, within minimum and cap | USD 140,800 |
| Advisory economic cost | Retainer-credit balance plus other fee, 0% example tax | USD 150,800 |
| Total seller economic costs | Advisory + legal/accounting + other cost + tax reserve | USD 1,250,800 |
| Expected nominal net proceeds | USD 7.56m − total economic costs | USD 6,309,200 |
| Expected PV net proceeds | USD 7,421,070 − total economic costs | USD 6,170,270 |
The USD 1,000,000 tax reserve and 2% success-fee rate are fictional mechanics, not market averages, recommended terms, or a tax estimate.
Replace every amount with a consistent seller-specific deal record.
Only the contract rate changes; the calculator then reapplies the minimum, cap, retainer credit, and indirect tax.
A binding minimum can prevent savings from a lower percentage, while a binding cap can prevent added cost from a higher percentage.
Compare no holdback or earnout recovery, the entered expectation, and full recovery while holding seller costs constant.
If advisory compensation is based on potential consideration, a lower collection probability does not automatically reduce the contractual fee.
Do not compare percentage headlines alone.
Normalize the compensation base, minimum, cap, retainer credit, earnout treatment, expenses, and indirect tax, then compare effective fee rate and advisory burden against the same expected proceeds.
A higher headline can still deliver lower present-value net proceeds after debt deductions, working-capital mechanics, escrow, earnout, and seller costs.
Compare price, payment certainty, and timing under one seller proceeds boundary.
Subtract total advisory invoice cash and all other entered costs from fixed proceeds at closing.
If the result is negative, revisit the actual payment dates for retainer, tax, cost sharing, and financing rather than treating the simplified closing-cost assumption as a literal bank balance.
No. Sector, deal size, exclusivity, mandate scope, difficulty, competition, and jurisdiction can change commercial terms. Enter actual proposals and contract terms.
Follow the LOI or SPA definition. Choose enterprise value for a cash-free, debt-free headline that still needs cash and debt adjustments; choose equity value for an aggregate share price that already reflects them.
A holdback is fixed consideration paid later and potentially reduced by claims or adjustments. An earnout is additional consideration triggered by future performance. Do not enter the same amount in both fields.
No. When the credited retainer exceeds the contract success fee, the success balance is floored at zero. Any refund, carryforward, or nonrefund clause must be reviewed in the agreement.
Use a percentage supported by tax review of the recipient, invoice, business connection, exempt activity, and allocation rules. The calculator does not apply Korean Article 38 or Article 39 to your facts.
Share versus asset form, individual versus entity seller, residence, ownership history, consideration type, and jurisdiction can change the tax base and rate. This tool connects a separate tax workstream to the proceeds bridge.
No. It is a closing-date economic comparison using your probability and discount-rate assumptions. Nominal payments, release dates, setoff, and disputes remain governed by the transaction documents and performance.
Yes, but run each LOI as a separate scenario with its own value definition, deductions, payment schedule, earnout, costs, and tax reserve. Do not compare only the final headline value.
Sources were checked on August 9, 2026.
Before a real transaction, recheck current law, the SPA or APA, advisory engagement, closing funds-flow, invoices, and jurisdiction-specific legal, tax, accounting, and valuation advice.
Align the LOI, purchase agreement, advisory engagement, and tax workstream to one currency and one seller boundary before entering values.
Review closing cash, expected nominal proceeds, present value, fee sensitivity, and contingent recovery together so price, certainty, timing, and cost remain visible.