1. Analysis assumptions
Set the base year, 1–60 month horizon, annual workload growth, labor growth, one discount rate, required availability, and a non-duplicated loss per outage hour.
Compare cloud infrastructure and managed hosting with resource charges, support, internal operations, migration, downtime, commitments, SLA allowances, and present-value TCO.
Use the same performance, usage, and horizon for both quotes. Align CPU generation, storage latency, backup retention, and support coverage in writing.
Transfer the selected server fleet and resource rates from an official pricing calculator or actual bill. The commitment discount applies only to compute.
Separate the base-plan allowances from overage rates. Do not enter support, backup, or security twice when it is already bundled.
Result by present-value TCO
Tie
Present-value savings
$0.00 (0%)
Cloud PV TCO
$0.00
Managed PV TCO
$0.00
Cloud current monthly recurring
$0.00
Managed current monthly recurring
$0.00
| Metric | Cloud server | Managed hosting |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal TCO | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Present-value TCO | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Average monthly TCO | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Provider and resource cost | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Licensing, tools, and support | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Internal operations labor | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Expected outage cost | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Transition cost | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total management hours | 0 hours | 0 hours |
| SLA downtime allowance | 8.76 hours/year | 8.76 hours/year |
| Gap to required availability | +0%p | +0%p |
| Current total cost per vCPU | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Current total cost per RAM GB | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cost category | Cloud server | Managed hosting |
|---|---|---|
| Compute or base plan | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Storage | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| IOPS | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Outbound transfer | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Backup | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Public IP | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Licensing, monitoring, security, and support | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Internal operations labor | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Expected outage cost | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Total | $0.00 | $0.00 |
0 hours/month
0 GB/month
Migration, upfront commitment, planned downtime, and dual-run costs are excluded from these recurring-cost thresholds.
| Operating year | Ending usage multiple | Cloud server · Nominal TCO | Managed hosting · Nominal TCO | Cloud cumulative PV | Managed cumulative PV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (2026) | 1.091× | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2 (2027) | 1.2× | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 3 (2028) | 1.32× | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Baseline usage | Cloud PV TCO | Managed PV TCO | PV advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70% | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| 100% | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| 130% | $0.00 | $0.00 | Tie |
| Commitment scenario | Compute discount | Term | Cloud PV TCO | PV advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No commitment | 0% | 0 months | $0.00 | Tie |
| Current input | 0% | 0 months | $0.00 | Tie |
| Discount +10 points | 10% | 0 months | $0.00 | Tie |
Cloud infrastructure makes it easy to resize resources and pay for measured use, while managed hosting packages infrastructure and an agreed level of operational help into a recurring plan.
The cheaper invoice is not necessarily the lower-cost decision once licenses, monitoring, security, support, internal administration, migration, dual running, and expected disruption are measured on the same basis.
This calculator places those costs in one monthly cash-flow model for up to 60 months and shows both nominal total cost of ownership and discounted present-value TCO.
It also tests 70%, 100%, and 130% workload scenarios, cloud commitment discounts, and current-month break-even points for operating hours and outbound traffic.
It stores no vendor price table because regions, currencies, service families, taxes, support tiers, and contracts change.
Enter current official estimates, invoices, and written proposals in one currency and on the same tax basis.
Matching vCPU and RAM counts does not prove equal performance.
Processor generation, oversubscription, burst limits, storage latency, network quality, operating-system responsibility, backup retention, and support response can all change the practical service delivered by the same headline capacity.
Send the same baseline worksheet to both suppliers and document every inclusion, exclusion, limit, and upgrade trigger before trusting the comparison.
| Comparison area | Normalize | Evidence to retain |
|---|---|---|
| Compute | vCPU, RAM, processor family, clock behavior, and operating hours | Official estimate and technical specification |
| Storage | Capacity, IOPS, throughput, latency, snapshots, and retention | Quote line items and performance terms |
| Network | Outbound scope, region traffic, CDN, and public IP addresses | Pricing boundary and included allowance |
| Operations | Patching, monitoring, backup, restore tests, deployment, and incident response | Responsibility matrix and support hours |
| Availability | Measurement target, exclusions, required topology, response, and credit process | Signed SLA and service description |
| Transition and exit | Migration, testing, dual running, downtime, export, and deletion | Project estimate and contract terms |
The calculator warns when included vCPU or RAM is below current demand or below demand at the end of the analysis horizon.
It does not invent a higher plan or price because package design differs by provider.
Obtain an eligible plan quote, replace the base fee and included capacity, and calculate again.
Set the base year, 1–60 month horizon, annual workload growth, labor growth, one discount rate, required availability, and a non-duplicated loss per outage hour.
Enter total vCPU, RAM, storage, IOPS, outbound traffic, backup storage, public IP count, and cloud compute operating hours for the same service.
Translate the selected server group into an hourly compute price and add storage, IOPS, outbound, backup, and public-IP unit prices.
Separate the monthly base plan, every included allowance, and each overage rate instead of treating the package as unlimited.
Enter licenses, tools, support, internal administration, migration, dual running, planned downtime, and expected annual outage hours for each option.
Enter only the effective cloud compute discount, its applicable months and prepayment, each provider price-growth assumption, and the written availability SLA.
For month m, workload grows by the entered annual rate raised to (m − 1) / 12.
Provider resource prices, licenses, tools, and support use the selected option’s annual price-growth assumption, while internal labor uses the common labor-growth assumption.
Public IP count and the managed base-plan fee do not grow automatically, and the model never assumes a managed-plan upgrade price.
Migration cost, cloud commitment prepayment, and migration downtime loss are treated as time-zero costs and are not discounted.
Dual-running cost occurs at the end of each entered month and is discounted with that month’s recurring cost.
The same annual discount rate is applied to both options, following the consistent-alternative principle in NIST Handbook 135e2022.
Nominal TCO and present-value TCO answer different questions, so neither should be silently substituted for the other.
In the deterministic 12-month example used by the calculator tests, workload growth and discounting are set to zero and outage loss is 100 per hour.
Current recurring cost is 1,105 for cloud and 965 for managed hosting.
After migration, commitment, dual-running, and downtime items, nominal and present-value TCO are 14,980 for cloud and 12,280 for managed hosting, so managed hosting is lower by 2,700 under those inputs.
The figures are dimensionless example amounts, not a market benchmark or supplier quote.
| Metric | Cloud | Managed |
|---|---|---|
| Current monthly recurring cost | 1,105 | 965 |
| Transition cost | 1,720 | 700 |
| 12-month nominal TCO | 14,980 | 12,280 |
| 12-month present-value TCO | 14,980 | 12,280 |
| 99.9% SLA time allowance | 8.76 hours/year | 8.76 hours/year |
For this example, current recurring costs cross near 22.22 cloud operating hours per month and 480 GB of outbound traffic.
Those break-even points use only current recurring costs and hold every other input fixed.
They exclude migration, prepayment, and dual running, so the option with the lower recurring cost can still have the higher full-horizon present-value TCO.
This solves for cloud compute hours between 0 and 744 while the managed fee and every other current-month input stay fixed. If no crossing exists, one recurring-cost curve remains lower throughout the search range.
This accounts for the managed included allowance and overage rate, which creates a piecewise cost curve. Validate which traffic is chargeable and whether CDN, regional transfer, backup export, or private connectivity uses a different rate.
The simple stress test scales compute, storage, IOPS, outbound traffic, and backup together. Real workloads rarely move in perfect proportion, so rerun individual fields when only one resource changes materially.
The on-demand, entered commitment, and entered discount plus 10 percentage-point scenarios change compute discount only. Storage, transfer, support, licenses, eligibility, utilization, and cancellation risk do not receive an assumed discount.
Applying 99.9% to 8,760 annual hours produces approximately 8.76 hours of time outside that availability percentage, but the result is only a comparison allowance.
An SLA is a contract with a measured service, measurement window, exclusions, required architecture, claim procedure, and usually a service-credit remedy.
It is not a probability forecast that the system will fail for exactly that duration.
Application availability across multiple services can differ from an individual component SLA, and support response time is not necessarily recovery time.
Estimate annual outage hours from incident records, monitoring, recovery exercises, and architecture review.
Loss per hour may include missed contribution margin, lost productivity, and emergency recovery cost, provided the same loss is not counted twice.
The calculator does not certify recovery-time objectives, recovery-point objectives, data durability, restore success, or SLA-credit eligibility.
Test peak outbound traffic, backup growth, after-hours response, and contribution loss per outage hour instead of focusing on compute hours alone.
Compare the value of stopping cloud compute outside business hours with the managed monthly plan, while retaining patching and access-management labor.
Separate migration work and one to three months of dual running to reveal the first-year cash peak, then evaluate commitment only after usage stabilizes.
Use annual growth and the 130% scenario to identify when managed included capacity or overage charges become the dominant assumption.
A provider calculator estimates services sold by that provider. This calculator uses that estimate as one input and compares two complete operating models, including managed-plan allowances, internal labor, transition, outage assumptions, and present value.
It applies only to the entered compute hourly price during the commitment months. It does not automatically discount storage, IOPS, transfer, backup, IP addresses, licenses, tools, or support, and prepayment remains a separate time-zero input.
Leave the corresponding separate monthly inputs at zero, enter the included backup capacity, and enter only a documented overage rate. Confirm the responsibility matrix because the word managed has no universal scope.
A high SLA does not prove zero expected interruption. Use operating evidence or a clearly documented scenario, and read the SLA time allowance only as a contract-comparison metric.
The two current recurring-cost curves may not cross within the search range, or their traffic slopes may be identical. Check the cloud rate, managed included allowance, overage rate, and chargeable traffic definition.
With a positive discount rate, later monthly costs have a lower present value. Time-zero migration and prepayment costs are not discounted, and one common rate is applied to both options.
No. Validate performance, security, recovery, data location, legal and tax treatment, exit terms, and supplier health before making the decision.
The methodology and source boundaries were reviewed on August 12, 2026.
The model uses the life-cycle cost and present-value principle from NIST Handbook 135e2022, and the baseline, assumption-documentation, and sensitivity principles from GAO-20-195G.
Google Cloud’s Well-Architected guidance supports including infrastructure, software licenses, personnel, and expected growth in a TCO view.
The AWS Pricing Calculator FAQ defines why actual usage, region, data transfer, price changes, commitment, support, tax, and third-party licenses can make invoices differ from estimates.
This tool is not a vendor price list, tax or legal opinion, accounting policy, performance test, security assessment, or SLA-credit determination.
Use current like-for-like quotes, technical validation, operating records, and signed contract terms for an actual decision.
Send both suppliers the same workload and responsibility worksheet, then enter the returned allowances, overage rates, support scope, and SLA terms.
Check whether the decision remains stable across usage and commitment scenarios before approving a multi-year budget.