Current monthly profit
KRW -1,204,352
35 daily users · 70% utilization
Connect Korean 2026 adult day care benefit fees, capacity, average daily users, role-by-role staffing, shuttle and meal costs, collection lag, and opening cash to estimate break-even and funding need.
Defaults are illustrative. Replace every value with official pre-consultation feedback, drawings, quotes, employment terms, and claims evidence.
Current monthly profit
KRW -1,204,352
35 daily users · 70% utilization
Break-even daily users
39 users
78% utilization
Minimum opening cash
KRW 213,781,011
Lowest cash in month 5
Additional funding needed
KRW 63,781,011
Gap between available cash and the 12-month cumulative cash need
KRW 59,640
2026 official amount for the representative grade and time band
KRW 49,095,648
User-days × verified average fee × realization rate
KRW 35,100,000
One care worker per 7 users, rounded up, plus reserve staff
47.05%
Monthly planning proxy · 2026 reference 48.6%
Reference counts are a planning screen for general adult day care. Recheck hours, qualifications, concurrent roles, and average-user measurement against filing records.
| Role | Reference | Planned | Unit cost | Monthly total | 48.6% numerator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director | 1 | 1 | KRW 3,800,000 | KRW 3,800,000 | KRW 0 |
| Social worker | 1 | 1 | KRW 3,100,000 | KRW 3,100,000 | KRW 3,100,000 |
| Nurse / aide / PT / OT | 1 | 1 | KRW 3,200,000 | KRW 3,200,000 | KRW 3,200,000 |
| ★ Care worker | 5 | 6 | KRW 2,800,000 | KRW 16,800,000 | KRW 16,800,000 |
| Office worker | 1 | 1 | KRW 2,800,000 | KRW 2,800,000 | KRW 0 |
| Cook | 1 | 1 | KRW 2,600,000 | KRW 2,600,000 | KRW 0 |
| Assistant / driver | 1 | 1 | KRW 2,800,000 | KRW 2,800,000 | KRW 0 |
| Other added staff | 0 | 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 | KRW 0 |
| Total staff cost | KRW 35,100,000 | KRW 23,100,000 | |||
Capacity stays fixed while users change, exposing staffing thresholds and monthly profit.
| Utilization | Users | Revenue | Cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50% | 25 | KRW 38,068,320 | KRW 49,300,000 | KRW -11,231,680 |
| ★ 70% | 35 | KRW 53,295,648 | KRW 54,500,000 | KRW -1,204,352 |
| 85% | 43 | KRW 65,477,510 | KRW 62,020,000 | KRW 3,457,510 |
| 95% | 48 | KRW 73,091,174 | KRW 63,220,000 | KRW 9,871,174 |
Current users and drivers stay fixed while vehicle fixed cost changes. This does not validate route capacity.
| Vehicles | Users / vehicle | Fixed cost | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | KRW 10,200,000 | KRW -404,352 |
| ★ 2 | 17.5 | KRW 11,000,000 | KRW -1,204,352 |
| 3 | 11.67 | KRW 11,800,000 | KRW -2,004,352 |
Revenue becomes cash after the selected lag; setup expense and deposit leave in month one.
| Month | Daily users | Revenue earned | Cash receipts | Operating cost | Startup outflow | Ending cash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 35 | KRW 53,295,648 | KRW 0 | KRW 54,500,000 | KRW 150,000,000 | KRW -54,500,000 |
| 2 | 36 | KRW 54,818,381 | KRW 53,295,648 | KRW 57,540,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -58,744,352 |
| 3 | 37 | KRW 56,341,114 | KRW 54,818,381 | KRW 57,780,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -61,705,971 |
| 4 | 38 | KRW 57,863,846 | KRW 56,341,114 | KRW 58,020,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -63,384,857 |
| ★ 5 | 39 | KRW 59,386,579 | KRW 57,863,846 | KRW 58,260,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -63,781,011 |
| 6 | 40 | KRW 60,909,312 | KRW 59,386,579 | KRW 58,500,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -62,894,432 |
| 7 | 41 | KRW 62,432,045 | KRW 60,909,312 | KRW 58,740,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -60,725,120 |
| 8 | 42 | KRW 63,954,778 | KRW 62,432,045 | KRW 58,980,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -57,273,075 |
| 9 | 43 | KRW 65,477,510 | KRW 63,954,778 | KRW 62,020,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -55,338,297 |
| 10 | 44 | KRW 67,000,243 | KRW 65,477,510 | KRW 62,260,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -52,120,787 |
| 11 | 45 | KRW 68,522,976 | KRW 67,000,243 | KRW 62,500,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -47,620,544 |
| 12 | 46 | KRW 70,045,709 | KRW 68,522,976 | KRW 62,740,000 | KRW 0 | KRW -41,837,568 |
A Korean adult day care center business plan usually combines approved capacity, staff, floor area, shuttle vehicles, meals, and projected revenue.
Actual operating cash, however, is driven by the number of people who attend on an average operating day and by how many days the center opens each month.
Two centers with the same capacity of fifty can have very different care-worker counts, user-days, meal cost, benefit revenue, and cash runway when one averages twenty-five users and the other averages forty.
This calculator keeps approved capacity separate from average daily users and connects both to the 2026 Korean adult day care benefit-fee schedule and the general staffing screen.
It estimates staffing by role, monthly revenue, operating cost, the break-even daily-user count, utilization sensitivity, shuttle-vehicle sensitivity, and a twelve-month cash schedule.
It is not a designation approval tool or a local demand forecast, so use the result to prepare questions, drawings, quotes, and an official pre-consultation with the municipality and the National Health Insurance Service.
MOHW Notice 2025-247 sets the general adult day care daily benefit amounts effective January 1, 2026.
The amount varies by long-term-care grade and the time band used on that day.
Selecting a representative grade and duration loads the matching official amount, while the verified average daily benefit fee remains editable for a real business plan.
| Daily service duration | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | Grade 5 | Cognitive support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 to under 6 hours | KRW 41,820 | KRW 38,720 | KRW 35,740 | KRW 34,120 | KRW 32,490 | KRW 32,490 |
| 6 to under 8 hours | KRW 56,060 | KRW 51,930 | KRW 47,940 | KRW 46,300 | KRW 44,650 | KRW 44,650 |
| 8 to under 10 hours | KRW 69,730 | KRW 64,590 | KRW 59,640 | KRW 58,010 | KRW 56,360 | KRW 56,360 |
| 10 to 13 hours | KRW 76,820 | KRW 71,160 | KRW 65,750 | KRW 64,090 | KRW 62,460 | KRW 56,360 |
| Over 13 hours | KRW 82,370 | KRW 76,310 | KRW 70,500 | KRW 68,860 | KRW 67,240 | KRW 56,360 |
A real center serves several grades and time bands, while absences, monthly benefit limits, additions, reductions, and claim adjustments can change recognized revenue.
The selected amount is therefore a starting value rather than permission to multiply one fee by every planned user-day.
Replace it with a weighted average supported by an anonymized claims sample or a detailed user roster, and use the claim realization rate as a separate conservative haircut.
Enter non-covered revenue only for items that may lawfully be disclosed and agreed, such as eligible meal-ingredient charges, and never charge separately for an activity already included in the benefit fee.
The planning screen follows Article 29 and Annex 9 of the Enforcement Rule of the Older Persons Welfare Act for general adult day care.
It starts with one director, one combined health professional from the nurse, nursing-aide, physical-therapist, or occupational-therapist group, and a reference minimum of one assistant or driver.
One social worker appears at ten planned users, one office worker appears at twenty-five, and one cook remains in the plan unless qualifying full-meal outsourcing is selected.
| Role | Planning rule | At 35 users |
|---|---|---|
| Director | One at all modeled user counts | 1 |
| Social worker | One from 10 users | 1 |
| Health professional | One combined nurse, aide, PT, or OT position | 1 |
| Care worker | One per 7 users, rounded upward | 5 required |
| Office worker | One from 25 users | 1 |
| Cook | One in-house, or zero only under qualifying full outsourcing | 1 |
| Assistant / driver | Reference minimum one, with actual planned drivers entered separately | 1 |
Thirty-five daily users divided by seven gives five required care workers.
Thirty-six users gives 5.14, which is rounded upward to six rather than rounded to the nearest whole number or truncated.
With one reserve worker in the example, the planned care-worker count moves from six at thirty-five users to seven at thirty-six users.
The calculator recomputes this step cost at every integer user count instead of assuming smooth linear labor cost.
A regulatory reference count is not automatically a workable roster after leave, training, vacancies, meal breaks, and shuttle overlap.
Add reserve care workers explicitly and enter the actual driver plan instead of assuming that one reference position covers every route.
The model does not automatically apply the narrow concurrent-role exception that may be available to some centers below ten users.
Qualifications, full-time status, working hours, concurrent duties, and the official measurement of user count require case-specific confirmation.
The break-even daily-user count is the first integer from one through approved capacity for which monthly operating profit is zero or positive.
This is more reliable than dividing fixed cost by a single-user contribution margin because the calculator rebuilds the staffing table at every user count.
It therefore captures the labor jumps around eight, ten, fifteen, twenty-two, twenty-five, twenty-nine, thirty-six, and other thresholds created by the one-per-seven rule.
If a later staffing jump creates another loss after the first break-even point, the calculator displays a reversal warning so that one headline number does not hide the adjacent risk.
The example assumes capacity of fifty, thirty-five average daily users, twenty-four operating days, Grade 3 service from eight to under ten hours at KRW 59,640, and a 98% claim realization rate.
It also assumes one reserve care worker, two shuttle vehicles, one driver, and the illustrative labor and operating costs visible in the input form.
These values are neither market averages nor recommended quotes, and their only purpose is to make every calculation traceable before you replace them.
| Measure | Illustrative result | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly benefit revenue | KRW 49,095,648 | Eight hundred forty user-days, fee, and realization rate |
| Monthly total revenue | KRW 53,295,648 | Benefit revenue plus KRW 4,200,000 non-covered revenue |
| Monthly operating cost | KRW 54,500,000 | KRW 35,100,000 staff, KRW 8,400,000 variable, and KRW 11,000,000 fixed |
| Current monthly profit | -KRW 1,204,352 | The thirty-five-user illustration remains loss-making |
| Break-even | 39 users at 78% | First non-negative month after the care-worker threshold at thirty-six users |
| Minimum opening cash | KRW 213,781,011 | Setup, deposit, operating cost, and one-month collection lag |
| Additional funding needed | KRW 63,781,011 | Gap after the illustrative KRW 150,000,000 available cash |
The example rent, labor, shuttle, and meal figures are not survey averages for any Korean city.
Actual results can move materially with wage conditions, property use, fit-out scope, route mileage, food contracts, user grade mix, and recognized claims.
Do not raise the fee assumption merely to make the model profitable; document why a grade-and-duration mix supports the amount.
The result of 39 users is valid only for this exact input bundle and must be recalculated when quotes or employment terms change.
The general adult day care screen starts at 90 m² of gross floor area and adds 6.6 m² of living or bedroom space for each capacity place above five.
At capacity fifty, the additional living or bedroom amount is 297 m² and the conservative gross-area planning result is 387 m².
This arithmetic cannot decide whether shared area counts, whether a room is properly separated, whether the building use is eligible, or how a mixed-use facility allocates common space.
Ask the municipality to review the actual floor plan before signing an irreversible lease or construction contract.
The calculator compares a monthly planning ratio with the 2026 adult day care labor-spending reference of 48.6%.
Its numerator includes social-worker, health-professional, and care-worker cost plus only the additional labor that the user has confirmed as eligible.
Its denominator is monthly benefit revenue rather than total revenue including non-covered charges.
The statutory rule looks at annual actual spending, eligible roles, and recognized labor items, so this monthly proxy is a warning light and not a compliance determination.
The vehicle table keeps the current user count and driver plan constant and changes only vehicle fixed cost.
It answers a narrow budget question about the monthly financial effect of one fewer or one more vehicle.
It does not decide whether the route plan can carry every user safely or on time.
Earned revenue and cash receipts are different columns.
With a one-month collection lag, benefit and non-covered revenue earned in month one does not appear as cash receipts in month one, while setup expense and the refundable deposit leave immediately.
The model then moves average daily users by the monthly net-growth input, caps them at approved capacity, and rebuilds revenue, staffing, and operating cost for each month.
| Output | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest cash month | The month with the smallest ending-cash balance | Month 5 |
| Minimum opening cash | Opening amount required to keep modeled cumulative cash at or above zero | KRW 213,781,011 |
| Additional funding | Minimum opening cash less available cash, floored at zero | KRW 63,781,011 |
| Month-12 receivables | Revenue earned but not yet collected because of the lag | KRW 70,045,709 |
| Month-12 ending cash | Modeled cash after startup and monthly flows | -KRW 41,837,568 |
Minimum opening cash only prevents the modeled balance from falling below zero under the entered assumptions.
It does not add a safety reserve for construction overruns, delayed designation, slower hiring, vehicle failure, user cancellations, claim disputes, or an unexpected amendment.
Build separate downside cases with slower growth, lower realization, higher labor cost, and a longer collection lag before deciding how much liquidity to secure.
Test capacities of thirty and forty in the same candidate building.
Compare floor-area gaps, the office-worker threshold, and break-even utilization.
Keep user growth conservative because a larger room does not create demand.
Run a qualifying full-meal outsourcing case against in-house cook and ingredient cost.
Enter the vendor price as a real cost rather than merely removing the cook.
Confirm contract scope, hygiene responsibility, and evidence separately.
Replace fixed vehicle cost with comparable quotes.
Review monthly profit with one fewer and one more vehicle.
Validate the preferred count with actual addresses, time windows, and driver rosters.
Run monthly net user growth at zero, one, and two.
Compare the lowest cash month and additional funding need in each case.
Keep downside, base, and upside assumptions as separate decision records.
A.The calculator rebuilds the planning staff count from the entered daily users so that operating sensitivity remains visible.
Designation and staffing filings may use specific measurement periods and facility facts that this model cannot determine.
Do not interpret a large approved capacity as permission to operate indefinitely with a small daily-user staff plan.
A.No.
It is rounded upward so that a fraction does not create an uncovered requirement.
Seven users produce one, eight produce two, twenty-one produce three, and twenty-two produce four before reserve workers are added.
A.The checkbox changes the planning reference count for the cook to zero.
A qualifying full-meal contract, hygiene controls, vendor price, and evidence still require confirmation.
Enter the vendor amount in variable or fixed cost so the comparison does not omit the outsourced service.
A.No.
Enter only items that may lawfully be disclosed and agreed under the relevant contract and rules.
Duplicate charges for included programs or speculative income will overstate break-even performance.
A.No.
The screen is a monthly proxy against benefit revenue.
The actual rule depends on annual spending, eligible roles, and recognized labor items, so the result cannot replace statutory reporting.
A.Yes.
A single added user can trigger another care worker or an office role, causing a step increase in cost.
The model checks later user counts and displays a reversal warning when that occurs.
A.No.
It is the mathematical amount that keeps the entered twelve-month cumulative cash balance from falling below zero.
Add a separate reserve for delays, construction changes, vehicle breakdowns, slower demand, and claim disputes.
A.No.
The model covers general adult day care only.
Dementia-dedicated staffing, concurrent-role rules for co-located services, and shared-cost allocation require a separate plan.
Facility and staffing references were checked against Article 29 and current Annex 9 of the Enforcement Rule of the Older Persons Welfare Act.
Designation and claims context was checked against Articles 31 and 38 of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act and Article 23 of its Enforcement Rule.
Benefit fees and the 48.6% adult day care labor-spending reference were checked against MOHW Notice 2025-247, effective January 1, 2026.
The official sources were verified on August 22, 2026, and a later amendment may not yet be reflected in this calculator.
The model does not determine designation approval, local demand, permitted building use, fire and evacuation compliance, food hygiene, vehicle structure or insurance, individual qualifications or concurrent roles, tax, financing eligibility, dementia-dedicated staffing, or shared resources with home-care services.
Its result is an initial feasibility screen and does not guarantee designation, revenue, profit, occupancy, or financing.
Obtain case-specific confirmation before signing a lease, hiring staff, ordering vehicles, constructing the facility, or committing investment capital.
Start with conservative daily users, fee realization, and collection lag, then review every staffing, area, labor, and cash warning.
Replace illustrative costs with drawings, quotes, contracts, and employment terms, and use the resulting table as a structured question list for the municipality and NHIS.