Group A
Capped at starting employees in the calculation
Compare up to three actual Korean employee group accident insurance quotes across as many as five aggregated occupational and age groups. The dedicated bilingual calculator reuses one pure KRW function for starting headcount, planned hires and leavers, daily, monthly or no-proration settlement scenarios, annual per-person rates or a starting-roster total quote, separate fees, confirmed credits, company and employee funding, annual budget headroom, group allocation, minimum headcount, and accidental death, disability, diagnosis or surgery, and hospital daily coverage. It only recommends the lowest entered price when roster, scope and coverage amounts are aligned. The guide preserves Commercial Act Articles 638, 638-3, 731, 735-3, 737 and 739 in current MST 272919 effective July 23, 2026, plus Supreme Court cases 2007Da42877 and 2007Da42884 checked on July 31, 2026, without inventing premiums, risk multipliers, minimum group size, refund rates, underwriting or claim outcomes.
Use only premiums and settlement terms from actual written quotes.
Enter only aggregated employee groups. Do not enter names, employee IDs, medical history, or diagnoses. Premium fields start at zero and do not represent market averages.
The annual budget is compared with the company-funded amount. Enter zero to omit the budget test.
Annual amount the company can fund, not the full premium
Create up to five aggregated groups by duties, age band, and risk class. These labels do not generate rates; they connect your roster to quoted premiums.
Capped at starting employees in the calculation
Only quotes with entered premiums are included. For per-person pricing, enter every active group rate. For total pricing, enter the 12-month premium for the full starting roster.
Enter the quoted condition; there is no statutory default here
Capped at gross quoted cost
Enter the quoted condition; there is no statutory default here
Capped at gross quoted cost
Enter the quoted condition; there is no statutory default here
Capped at gross quoted cost
Illustrative values demonstrate the formulas; they are not market averages, official rates, or recommended premiums.
Comparison status
Enter premiums for at least two quotes to compare them.
Starting → year-end employees
50 → 50
Active quotes
0
Annual quote spread
KRW 0
Quotes within budget
Budget not set
Enter quote premiums or load the illustration to see results.
No possible personal coverage was selected. Review actual policy schedules before flagging overlaps.
A possible overlap is neither a cancellation recommendation nor a double-payment decision.
Rule year 2026 · official sources checked 2026-07-31. This tool compares budgets and quotes; it does not determine premiums, underwriting, claims, group rules, consent, tax, accounting, or legal compliance.
This page models group accident insurance purchased for employees in Korea.
It uses Korean Commercial Act boundaries checked on July 31, 2026, and keeps every amount in KRW.
It is a budget and quote-normalization tool, not insurance, underwriting, claims, legal, tax, accounting, or employee-benefit advice.
A one-line annual premium rarely makes three employee insurance quotes comparable.
Office, field, and management groups can have different age distributions and occupational classifications, while insurers can apply different underwriting, exclusions, benefit definitions, settlement rules, and minimum headcounts.
This calculator connects up to five aggregated employee groups with up to three actual written quotes and shows annual net premium, monthly equivalent, company-funded cost, employee-funded cost, group allocation, and joiner or leaver effects.
Korean statutes do not establish one national group accident premium, occupational multiplier, minimum group size, employer contribution, or joiner and leaver refund rate.
Enter an actual annual per-person rate or an actual 12-month total for the starting roster.
Do not enter names, employee numbers, resident registration numbers, diagnoses, medical history, or policy numbers.
Use only aggregated age bands, occupational groups, risk labels, and headcounts needed for a budget scenario.
Choose one roster date and reconcile every quote to that date before entering premiums.
If an insurer’s occupational or age classification does not match the HR system, ask the quote provider to map each employee group to the correct quoted rate.
| Source | Calculator input | Reconciliation check |
|---|---|---|
| Aggregated HR roster | Starting employees, planned hires, and planned leavers by group | Remove personal identifiers and use one roster date |
| Written premium quote | Annual per-person rates or 12-month starting-roster total | Include separate fees, confirmed credits, and minimum headcount |
| Coverage schedule | Accidental death, disability, accident lump sum, and hospital daily amount | Compare definitions, exclusions, reductions, and benefit limits |
| Policy and settlement sheet | Daily, monthly, or no midterm proration | Check whether joiner additions and leaver refunds use the same rule |
| Company budget record | Annual company cap and company-funded percentage | Review payroll deduction, consent, tax, and accounting separately |
When only a starting-roster total is available, the calculator divides it by starting headcount to derive an implied average annual premium.
It uses that average for joiner and leaver scenarios and allocates cost by equivalent employee-years.
This is an internal planning allocation, not the insurer’s occupational or age-level rating schedule.
Starting employees who are not expected to leave count as one full employee-year.
Planned hires and leavers use their entered average coverage days and each quote’s settlement method.
The result is a budget exposure measure and does not decide the actual date when insured status begins or ends.
Coverage days are divided by 365.
For example, 183 days equals about 0.50137 employee-years.
Coverage days are divided by the average 365 ÷ 12 days per month, and a touched month is rounded up.
This does not reproduce an insurer’s actual cutoff date or short-period rate.
Every starting employee and planned hire receives one full annual premium in the conservative cost scenario.
It does not mean that a former employee remains insured after leaving.
Equivalent employee-years = continuing employees + leavers × leaver factor + hires × hire factor
Scenario base premium = sum of group employee-years × actual annual group rate
Annual net premium = scenario base premium + separate fees − applied confirmed credit
Company-funded cost = annual net premium × company-funded share
Budget difference = annual company budget − company-funded cost
Some contracts add new hires daily but provide no refund for leavers, or apply a separate short-period table.
Run bounding scenarios when one option cannot express the mixed rule, then use the insurer’s actual endorsement and settlement sheet for the final budget.
The following numbers demonstrate the calculation and are not Korean market averages, official rates, or recommended premiums.
The company budget is KRW 9,500,000 and the company funds 80%.
The starting roster has 75 employees, with 7 planned hires and 4 planned leavers, producing a year-end headcount of 78.
All three quotes show KRW 100,000,000 accidental death, KRW 100,000,000 accidental disability, KRW 1,000,000 accident diagnosis or surgery lump sum, and KRW 30,000 hospital daily benefit.
| Metric | Quote A | Quote B | Quote C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing and settlement | Group rates / daily | Group rates / monthly | Roster total / daily |
| Equivalent employee-years | 76.6822 | 77.5833 | 76.6822 |
| Scenario base premium | KRW 11,982,411 | KRW 12,150,417 | KRW 12,269,151 |
| Annual net premium | KRW 11,782,411 | KRW 12,050,417 | KRW 12,069,151 |
| Company-funded cost | KRW 9,425,929 | KRW 9,640,334 | KRW 9,655,321 |
| KRW 9,500,000 company budget | Within budget | KRW 140,334 over | KRW 155,321 over |
When roster, coverage, exclusions, and amounts are confirmed as equivalent, Quote A becomes the price recommendation and the annual high-low spread is KRW 286,740.
If Quote C increases accidental death coverage to KRW 150,000,000, the comparison changes to a coverage-mismatch status.
Quote A remains the lowest entered price but is no longer labeled a recommendation because the benefit designs are not equal.
The same face amount can create a different benefit flow depending on whether the beneficiary is the employee, heirs, or the company.
Review the group rules and the beneficiary or consent structure under Commercial Act Article 735-3.
The screen compares the insured amount only.
An actual payment can depend on the disability schedule, percentage, same-body-part rules, pre-existing impairment, and policy wording.
Fracture, burn, and named-procedure benefits may differ by diagnosis code, procedure definition, repeat-payment rule, and annual limit.
Reconcile the detailed schedule rather than one representative amount alone.
Direct treatment, minimum admission hours, payment start day, and maximum covered days can materially change value.
A higher daily amount is not automatically equivalent or better coverage.
Article 638 describes an insurance contract around an agreed premium and agreed payment when an uncertain event affecting property, life, or body occurs.
Article 638-3 requires delivery and explanation of important policy terms when the contract is entered.
Use the final application, policy wording, certificate, roster, and material-terms explanation ahead of this planning result.
Article 731 generally requires written consent for insurance on another person’s death.
Article 735-3 addresses group insurance entered under group rules and the additional rule when the policyholder designates someone other than the insured or heirs as beneficiary.
The calculator does not validate group rules, beneficiary designation, or whether separate consent is required.
Article 737 addresses the accident insurer’s responsibility for agreed payment when a bodily injury insurance event occurs.
Article 739 applies life-insurance provisions to accident insurance, except Article 732, so the group-insurance structure also requires review for group accident coverage.
In its October 12, 2007 decision, the Korean Supreme Court explained that group insurance protection ends when an insured person loses group-member status through retirement or another qualifying departure.
Continuing to pay premium after the employee left did not by itself preserve that protection in the case.
Therefore, review roster-removal notice, eligibility end, refund or extra charge, individual conversion, and coverage-gap procedures under the actual contract.
Employees may already hold accidental death, disability, fracture or surgery lump-sum, and hospital daily benefits in personal policies.
Overlap does not by itself prove that a benefit will be reduced, paid twice, or should be cancelled.
Fixed-benefit and indemnity coverage operate differently, and every payment still depends on policy wording.
Group insurance depends on employment status and the company contract, so it can disappear after departure or non-renewal.
A replacement personal policy can require new underwriting and a different premium.
A simple overlap flag is not enough evidence for an employee to reduce or cancel long-term personal protection.
Add expected hires and leavers to build a first-year funding envelope, then compare 100% and 80% company-funded scenarios.
If employees contribute, review consent, payroll deduction, labor, tax, and accounting treatment separately.
Obtain refreshed quotes for one roster and benefit design, then isolate group rates, fees, and confirmed credits.
Use the comparison gates to find a missing group or benefit hidden behind a lower headline total.
Add projected field hires and average coverage days to test budget sensitivity.
Use the insurer’s occupational classification and underwriting result rather than an assumed risk multiplier.
Run daily, monthly, and no-proration versions to bound the first-year settlement effect.
Close the budget with the insurer’s actual endorsement, refund, and notice schedule rather than the model alone.
The calculator does not apply one because Korean law does not set a universal minimum for these quotes. Enter the actual underwriting condition stated by the provider.
No universal rate is built into the model. The funding split is a company-policy input, and employee consent, payroll, tax, and accounting consequences require separate review.
No. Refunds, extra charges, short-period rates, notice timing, and minimum premiums depend on the policy and settlement sheet. Use the insurer record for the final amount.
Yes, but it uses an implied starting-roster average rate and allocates by equivalent employee-years. Request a group-rate schedule when exact departmental allocation is required.
The calculator cannot make that conclusion. Compare payment triggers, beneficiary, fixed versus indemnity design, the end of group eligibility, and future personal underwriting.
No. The label only identifies the lowest entered premium after core comparison checks. Review final policy wording, exclusions, beneficiary, settlement, service, data handling, and contract terms.
The National Law Information Center OPEN API was checked on July 31, 2026.
The current Commercial Act version was MST 272919, Act No. 20991, effective July 23, 2026.
Recheck the current-history code, Articles 735-3 and 739, relevant case-law boundaries, policy wording, and product disclosures at the next renewal.
Premiums, minimum headcount, and settlement rates are not statutory constants, so replace every old quote with a current written quote.
Replace every illustration with the latest aggregated workforce plan, actual quote, coverage schedule, and joiner or leaver clause.
Recording net premium, funding split, group allocation, budget gap, and benefit differences creates a clearer renewal and internal approval record than one headline price.
When cost differences are small, evaluate claim support, roster endorsement service, policy explanation, data protection, and contract service levels separately.